Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BowTShrike's avatar

This helps for the theory, but I still don't understand how perps play out in practice.

Suppose Peter Schiff and Mike Saylor each took out a perp on bitcoin. How would they do it? How badly would Peter Schiff get clobbered over this month and next if BTC goes up as expected? If he took a more conservative position, would he be able to make money? What risks would they be carrying? Is aiming for 100x leverage the standard, or is that a massively degen position?

Expand full comment
Doge Brogan's avatar

Great article as always! The more I read your articles, the more I realize how much I don't know. I think these have been spelt out in the article but can I just confirm my understanding is correct:

(1) Funding rate on Bitcoin is currently positive (https://www.coinglass.com/FundingRate). Am I right to say that means:

(a) If you are short BTC, then you will receive the funding rate?

(b) If you are long BTC, you have to pay the funding rate?

(c) This means that the market expects the future price of BTC to be higher than where it is currently?

(2) If the funding rate is negative, then that means

(a) If you are short BTC, you will pay the funding rate?

(b) If you are long BTC, you will receive the funding rate?

(c) This means that the market expects the future price of BTC to be lower than where it is currently?

(3) Is a positive funding rate always bullish (ie. BTC price to go up)? Likewise, is a negative funding rate always bearish (ie. BTC price to go down)?

Thank you!

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts